Identified the hive designs for the Indian bee, Apis cerana himalaya, in the NEH region of India

Authors

  • S M Haldhar Principal Scientist
  • K I Singh Professor
  • A S Devi -

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58628/JAE-2418-113

Keywords:

Identification, Apis cerana himalaya, hive designing, brood area, honey store, pollen store, NEH region

Abstract

The Asian honey bee, Apis cerana, is a species of honey bee native to South, Southeast and East Asia. A. cerana himalaya colonies are known for building nests consisting of multiple combs in cavities containing a small entrance, presumably for defense against invasion by individuals of another nest. The sole purpose of a hive is to encourage the bees to construct their nest in such a way that it is easy to manage and maintain them. The influence of the hive’s design on the development of the honeybee colonies has been studied. In order to test the suitable design of hives, a total of 21 hives (Apis cerana himalaya colonies) were established, with three hives in each design serving as replications and assigned into seven treatment groups. Based on 2-year analysis from different hive designing experiments, ISI A type with eight frames has the maximum egg laying area of (312.33 cm2), brood area of (1238.99 cm2), honey store of (530.99 cm2) pollen stores of (524.77 cm2) followed by locally made hive with (260.16 cm2), (1216.33cm2), (413.49 cm2) and ( 470.91 cm2) of egg-laying area, brood area, honey store and pollen store respectively and the least was found in Modified ISI A type hive with brood chamber and frame reduced by 2 inch with six frames. This shows that ISI A type with eight frames is a scientific and most advanced hive for A. cerana himalaya. It is recommended that the ISI A type hive be followed by the locally-made hive best for A. cerana himalaya in the NEH region of India.

Author Biographies

  • S M Haldhar, Principal Scientist

    1Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture (CAU), Iroisemba, Imphal, Manipur 795004

    2 ICAR- National Research Centre for Integrated Pest Management, Rajpur Khurd, New Delhi-110068

  • K I Singh, Professor

    Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture (CAU), Iroisemba, Imphal, Manipur 795004

  • A S Devi, -

    Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture (CAU), Iroisemba, Imphal, Manipur 795004

References

Adedeji GA & Aiyeloja AA. 2014. Preference and suitability of Nigerian grown Gmelina arborea Linn. Roxb. and Vitex doniana sweet woods for beekeeping in Imeko, Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific Engineering Research (IJSER), 5 (5):1484-1493.

Ahmad A, Al-Ghamdi, Nuru Adgaba, Ahmed HH & Mohammad JA. 2017. Comparative analysis of the profitability of honey production using Traditional and box hives. Saudi J. Biol Sci., 24 (5): 1075-1080.

Bhusal SJ & Thapa RB. 2006. Response of colony strength to honey production: regression and correlation analysis. J. Inst. Agric. Anim. Sci., 27: 133-137.

Chaand D, Sharma D, Ganai SA, Norboo T & Sharma S. 2017. Effect of colony strength on colony build up and foraging activity of Apis mellifera L. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 5 (6): 1369-73.

Erdogan Y. 2019. Comparison of colony performances of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) housed in hives made of different materials. Italian Journal of Animal Science.

Haldhar SM, Nidhi CN, Singh KI & Devi AS. 2021a. Honeybees diversity, pollination, entrepreneurship and beekeeping scenario in NEH region of India. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology, 12: 27-43.

Haldhar SM, Singh KI, Gupta MK & Devi AS. 2021b. Morphometric analysis on different species of honeybees in NEH region of India. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology, 12: 62-73.

Harbo JR. 1993. Effect of brood rearing on honey consumption and the survival of worker honey bees. J. Apic. Res., 32 (1): 11-1.

Kasangaki P, Nyamasyo G, Ndegwa P & Kajobe R. 2018. Assessment of honeybee colony performance in the agroecological zones of Uganda.

Keller I, Fluri P & Imdorf A. 2005. Pollen nutrition and colony development in honey bees Part II. Bee World, 86 (2): 27-34. www.ibra.org.uk

Okyere-Amoateng R & Abugre S. 2021. Enhancing the viability of the modified taungya system through bee keeping. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 1-15.

Shawer MB, Shenishen Z & El-Dakhakhni NM. 1986. Effect of colony strength on flight activity and productivity of honey bee colonies. Bull. Soc. Ent. Egypt, 66: 65-73.

Siehler O & Bloch G. 2020. Colony volatiles and substrate-borne vibrations entrain circadian rhythms and are potential cues mediating social synchronization in honey bee colonies. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 35 (3): 246 256.

Singh KI, Haldhar SM and Maheshwari K. 2022. Scientific cares and management of Apis cerana himalaya. Pub: College of Agriculture, CAU, Imphal pp-93; ISBN: 978-81-947184-6-8.

Szabo T & Lefkovitch L. 1989. Effect of brood production and population size on honey production of honeybee colonies in Alberta, Canada. Apidologie, 20: 157- 163.

Thomas D, Pal N & Subba Rao K. 2002. Bee management and productivity of Indian honey bees. Proceedings of the 37th International Apicultural Congress, 28 October – 1 November 2001, Durban, South Africa

Tucak Z, Perispic M, Beslo D & Tucak, I. 2004. Influence of the beehive type on the quality of honey. Collegium Antropologicum, 28: 463–467.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

[1]
Haldhar, S.M. et al. 2024. Identified the hive designs for the Indian bee, Apis cerana himalaya, in the NEH region of India. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology. 18, (Jun. 2024), 73–77. DOI:https://doi.org/10.58628/JAE-2418-113.

Similar Articles

71-80 of 101

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)