Evaluation of artificial nesting materials for domiciliation of Megachile spp. and their impact on pigeonpea yield

Authors

  • MK Jat
  • S Yadav
  • L Kumar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58628/JAE-2622-103

Keywords:

Pollination, megachilid, bees, Sarkanda, Pigeonpea

Abstract

A field investigation was conducted to evaluate the nesting preferences of Megachilid bees and their contribution to pigeonpea yield under artificial domiciliation. Two nesting substrates—Sarkanda sticks (Saccharum spontaneum) and bamboo drilled blocks were monitored at 15‑day intervals. Sarkanda sticks exhibited higher acceptance (4.53%), whereas bamboo blocks remained unused throughout the study. Nesting activity peaked in October 2024 with 21 nests (3.96%), followed by November with 16 nests (3.01%). Four Megachilid species were recorded: Megachile lanata, M. sculpturalis, M. bicolor, and M. disjuncta. Among these, M. lanata was dominant, with activity ranging between 2.19–3.12 individuals per minute per square meter. Diversity indices revealed moderate species diversity (Shannon–Wiener index H′: 1.31–1.34; Simpson’s diversity D: 0.70–0.73) coupled with high evenness (0.94–0.97), indicating balanced species distribution across nesting sites. The impact of domiciliation on crop productivity was evident. Pigeonpea plots with artificial nests recorded significantly higher yields (13.89–14.68 q/ha) compared to control plots without nests (9.47 q/ha). This enhancement underscores the role of Megachilid bees as efficient pollinators, directly contributing to improved seed set and yield. Overall, the study highlights Sarkanda sticks as a suitable substrate for domiciliation of Megachilid bees and demonstrates the potential of managed nesting to augment pollination services in pigeonpea. Adoption of such practices could serve as a sustainable strategy to enhance legume productivity while conserving native pollinator diversity.

Author Biographies

  • MK Jat

    Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar - 125 004, Haryana, India

  • S Yadav

    Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar - 125 004, Haryana, India

  • L Kumar

    Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar - 125 004, Haryana, India

References

Albrecht M, Schmid B, Hautier Y & Muller C.B. 2012. Diverse pollinator communities enhance plant reproductive success. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279: 4845–4852.

Blaauw BR & Isaacs R. 2014. Flower plantings increase wild bee abundance and crop yield. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51: 890–898.

Bosch J & Kemp WP. 2001. How to Manage the Blue Orchard Bee. Sustainable Agriculture Network.

Cane J, Griswold T & Parker FD. 2007. Substrates and materials used for nesting by solitary bees. Apidologie, 38: 1–14.

Free JB. 1993. Insect Pollination of Crops. Academic Press.

Garibaldi LA, Dewenter SI & Winfree R. 2013. Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science, 339: 1608–1611.

Haldhar SM, Nidhi CN, Singh KI and Devi AS. 2021. Honeybees diversity, pollination, entrepreneurship and beekeeping scenario in NEH region of India. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology, 12: 27-43.

Klein AM, Vaissiere BE, Cane & JH. 2007. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 274: 303–313.

Kremen C, Williams NM and Thorp RW. 2002. Crop pollination from native bees. PNAS, 99: 16812–16816.

MacIvor JS & Packer L. 2015. Bee hotels as tools for native pollinator conservation: a premature verdict. Plos One, 10(3): e0122126.

Michener CD. 2007. The Bees of the World (2nd ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press.

Nidhi CN, Haldhar SM, Singh KI, Singh NO, Sinha B, Kencharddi RN, Mishra LK, Jat MK and Choudhary M. 2025. Physicochemical and antioxidant properties of honey across bee species from North Eastern Hill region of India. Scientific Reports, 15, 33759; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98040-w.

Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC & Kremen C. (2010). Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25: 345–353.

Ricketts TH. 2008. Landscape effects on crop pollination services. Ecology Letters, 11: 499–515.

Singer PTL & Cane JH. 2011. The alfalfa leafcutting bee, Megachile rotundata: the world most intensively managed solitary bee. Annual Review of Entomology, 56: 221–237.

Singh KI, Haldhar SM and Maheshwari K. 2022. Scientific cares and management of Apis cerana himalaya. Pub: College of Agriculture, CAU, Imphal pp-93; ISBN: 978-81-947184-6-8.

Tylianakis JM. 2010. Conservation of species interaction networks. Biological Conservation, 143: 2270–2279.

Winfree R. 2009. Native bees provide insurance against honey bee losses. Ecology Letters, 12: 1105–1113.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-24

How to Cite

[1]
Jat, M. et al. 2026. Evaluation of artificial nesting materials for domiciliation of Megachile spp. and their impact on pigeonpea yield. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology. 22, (May 2026), 32–37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.58628/JAE-2622-103.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)